[x264-devel] Regarding claiming for standard approval

[mahesh k]

thank you,
I do find  some difference in the quantization of X264 and our.
I tried to debug and check but I was not able to go iside this function

h->quantf.quant_4x4(i, dct4x4[1+i], h->quant4_mf[CQM_4IY][i_qscale],
h->quant4_bias[CQM_4IY][i_qscale] );
I think they are using function pointers. But my results are matching with
JM.
I was using microsoft *vidual studio express edition 2005. *
**
*Help me in saying how to debug or please let me know whether X264 is as per
H.264 standard or not.*
**

Regards,
Mahesh.
On Jan 30, 2008 11:39 PM, Alex Giladi <alex.giladi at gmail.com> wrote:

> There are conformance bitstreams somewhere.
> The best place to ask would be the jvt-experts.
> You can register at
> http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/jvt-experts
>
> 2008/1/30 mahesh k <maheswarreddy.k at gmail.com>:
>  > hi all,
> > Please excuse me IF i am not supposed to ask this question here.
> >
> > We are able to decode the H.264 bitstreams(bith X264 and JM). Can any
> one
> > tell me how to claim our decoder to be standardised.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mahesh.
> > _______________________________________________
> > x264-devel mailing list
> > x264-devel at videolan.org
> > http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20080131/a04bcdb5/attachment.htm