[x264-devel] [PATCH] x264 executable stack and selinux
Guillaume POIRIER
poirierg at gmail.com
Mon Jun 2 17:53:24 CEST 2008
Hello,
On 6/2/08, Loren Merritt <lorenm at u.washington.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Guillaume POIRIER wrote:
> >
> > However, I'm tempted to reject that patch since for some time already,
> > only YASM support has been supported, so having binaries built with
> > NASM that cause some trouble is to be expected.
> >
> > Maybe a cleared statement or a configure test should be added to
> > require YASM, but I doubt that it will please people, since IIRC,
> > simple cases such as static lib on Linux and Windows x86 (that is, a
> > large majority of x264's userbase) should work, thought it's mainly by
> > luck.
> >
> > I'd prefer if Loren could take a decision about the problem of NASM's support.
>
>
> nasm works for me.
Then I must have made some confusion in my mind with platform-specific
limitations/bug, e.g. on OSX 10.4, yasm is required to build the
dynamic version of x264's lib (static version works fine).
So what do you say Loren, do you like that patch?
Guillaume
--
I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he
bounces when he hits bottom.
-- George S. Patton
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list