No subject
Fri May 30 00:19:48 CEST 2008
with ReFrame > 5 or so. I can fix this by reencoding with a lower
reference frame count, but that is not fast enough for real-time
transcoding. (I get ~18-19 fps or so.) I'm wondering if it is feasible
to do a pass over the input file and transcode to a lower reference
frame count (without a full decode/encode), and if it is, whether this
would feasibly result in a speed boost? I'm not familiar with how the
reference frames are chosen in h264 (and I only have passing
familiarity with the basics of video encoding) so if someone could
give me a basic explanation I would appreciate it.
Curiously, on my test file, going from a ReFrame count of 8 to 3
reduces the file size about 1%; does this indicate that the optimal
setting is closer to 3 than to 8? I looked at my other files and I
see ReFrame counts of 6-15 more often than 4 or 5.
--
Frederick Akalin
http://www.akalin.cx
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list