[x264-devel] x264 codec
David Wolstencroft
lordrpi at gmail.com
Fri Nov 21 17:52:03 CET 2008
Would a DMO based encoder be preferable to a VFW encoder? I'm not too
familiar with this as I'm generally a Mac guy, but I am curious.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:37 AM, Jindrich Makovicka <makovick at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:38, Alan Harris <alan at resoft.co.uk> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Sorry, I was hoping to be able to download ready to use binary codecs
> > rather than the source code. The references on the VideoLan site are
> > "Unofficial builds for Windows are available from Jarod
> > <http://x264.nl/> or Sharktooth
> > <http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=89979>." However, these are the
> > command line program to convert formats rather than just the codec. I
> > hope I am not just being stupid here! Every other site appears to have
> > the same download.
> >
> > I am aware of the GPL licence, and have no intention of infringing it. I
> > am doing some experimentation work with the OpenSceneGraph project which
> > is LGPL, producing a video generator, which obviously needs a codec. I
> > have Xvid working, but reviews I have seen say that x264 is a lot better
> > and would like to try it.
>
> Avidemux has (among other goodies) x264 integrated, and there is a
> win32 build available:
>
> http://fixounet.free.fr/avidemux/download.html
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jindrich Makovicka
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20081121/5e1d0340/attachment.htm
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list