[x264-devel] Patch open gop
Trahald
wewk584 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 3 01:40:51 CEST 2009
i agree. now are you doing something different w/the cli? or was --b-pyramid
1 hypothetical
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser
<darkshikari at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Trahald<wewk584 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > ok.. i'll look at that. you cant have strict output with < 4 ref frames ,
> > there just arent enough slots to do it. But it shouldnt be corrupt. i'll
> > take a look
>
> So if I use --b-pyramid 1 (strict) with less than 4 refs, it won't
> give strict results?
>
> How about just warning about it and disabling b-pyramid if less than 4
> refs are specified, and strict mode is specified?
>
> Dark Shikari
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20090902/aa765533/attachment.htm>
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list