[x264-devel] CALL FOR MPEG4-AVC/H.264 CODECS - last chance
Dmitriy Vatolin
dmitriy at graphics.cs.msu.ru
Mon Feb 15 22:50:45 CET 2010
x264 will participate.
But in this list there are many other AVC codec's developers
(surely!).
Maybe they will be enough brave to compare with x264? :)
----------------------------------------------------------------
H.264 Comparison 2010 codecs submission deadline last time extended
to February 18, 2010.
* Please appease your managers: We understand that only few real
leaders are interested in results publication. But also partial and
private participation is possible. So you can show results only in
those nominations where results of your codec satisfy you.
* Developers provide us pretty fresh versions sometimes essentially
better, than publicly available from site for purchase (we
cross-check this). So you can compare you codec not only with old
version available from site (and pretty good for complacency :), but
with pretty fresh versions, that will be available several month
later.
* Please do not worry about potential bugs in hot builds - in case
of crashes or another obvious problems you will have time (a week)
to provide us updated fixed versions and all results will be
remeasured.
If even now you are afraid about quality of you codec, that there
are no reason to compare - please let us know. We are interested in
bigger number of good codecs and can measure weak and strong points
of your codec to help you tune it efficiently.
If you think, that all objective measures are obsolete in XXI
century and your codec essentially tuned for visual results - please
let us know. We plan to include visual comparison of codecs with
turned on and off psychovisual options.
If you have another reason to avoid external evaluation please let
us know - this is VERY interesting!
Please contact videocodec-testing at graphics.cs.msu.ru
================8<==============Original message text===============
As usual Moscow State University Graphics & Multimedia Laboratory
starts next 6-th H.264 codecs comparison.
Most interesting features this year:
* Objective comparison will be extended with subjective with
leading codecs visual comparison.
Also will be testes psycho-visual options and visual quality
during fade effects.
* We release system of extensive tests of codecs with improper
interface (like GUI only). ALL available options of such codecs
will be tested, so option choice for comparison will be correct
now.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you want to see some codec in our comparison - please let us
know! We will summarize votes and will add the most interesting
codecs. Please write us now. This can be not only H.264, but also
VC-1 or another (even proprietary).
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Below is information for codec developers:
===========================================================================
CALL FOR MPEG4-AVC/H.264 CODECS
Sixth H.264 video codec comparison
For practical researchers and developers in the field of high-end video compression
===========================================================================
Scope of Test
-------------
* Encoding time, speed/quality analysis
* Objective quality measurements (PSNR, SSIM, Average Advantage, etc.)
* Analysis of averaged objective results
* Leaders in different areas
Important Dates
---------------
February,18 - Deadline for receipt of a H.264 codec with required presets
March, 2 - Deadline for settling technical problems with codec’s functioning
March, 24 - Draft version of report that will be sent to all participants
April, 1 - Deadline for reception of comments to the draft
April, 7 - Comparison report release
Enhancements in comparison to Previous H.264/AVC Comparison
-----------------------------------------------------------
This comparison will includes some new features, that previous comparisons do not include
* Subjective comparison for the codes
* More codecs - we will include codecs available from the Internet and
will choose optimal presets by Option Analysis
* Comparison between Pareto optimal presets between different codecs
* Effectiveness analysis of some encoder options
(see example at Options Analysis of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Codec x264)
http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/x264_options_analysis_08_en.html
* New video sequences
Developer Deliverables
----------------------
The following deliverables should be provided by each developer:
* Codec files (CLI executable file is preferable)
* Short description of codec parameters
* Codec's presets with mentioning what H.264/AVC profiles are used
The full text of Call for Codecs is available at
http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/call_for_codecs_10.html
Variants of Participation
-------------------------
There are two variants for companies to participate in our comparison:
1. Participation for free. All results of your codec will be published,
except special cases of measurements problems due to codec
instability.
2. Private participation. A special report will be prepared only for your
company. This report contains:
* Your codec results and all material from the free version
* Special additional analysis of your codec
If you are interested in the private participation, please contact us
for details.
Also codec can be added into comparison by votes of professional
auditory.
Useful Links
------------
* Call for codecs-2010
http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/call_for_codecs_10.html
* Fifth Annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison
http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/mpeg-4_avc_h264_2009_en.html
* Options Analysis of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Codec x264
http://compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/x264_options_analysis_08_en.html
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Vatolin
===8<===========End of original message text===========
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Vatolin
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list