[x264-devel] interlace

[Jason Garrett-Glaser]

> Thanks. Was there a reason x264 did not add support for field coding (or
> even PAFF) and preferred field MB coding instead? Is there any plan to add
> support for field coding? Are there any performance comparison of field
> coding versus field MB only that someone can point me to?

Non-adaptive MBAFF was easier to implement and required less code than
field coding.

Furthermore, it naturally leads into adaptive MBAFF, which is superior
to PAFF in most cases.

Dark Shikari