[x264-devel] VP8 versus x264

SiPing Tao anhuitsp at mail.ustc.edu.cn
Mon May 31 07:10:29 CEST 2010


Your data only provides the performance comparison by default cfg, far from enough to show the advantages of x264 codec as well as VP8.


-----Original E-mail-----
> From: "Jason Garrett-Glaser" <darkshikari at gmail.com>
> Sent Time: 2010-05-31 09:47:40
> To: "Mailing list for x264 developers" <x264-devel at videolan.org>
> CC: 
> Subject: Re: [x264-devel] VP8 versus x264
> 
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Jirka Klaue <jirka.klaue at web.de> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've compared VP8 with x264, just PSNR and SSIM so far.
> > If you are interested: <http://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/research/evalvid/EvalVid/vp8_versus_x264.html>
> >
> > Jirka
> 
> If you're doing metric comparisons, turn psy opts off in both
> encoders.  That means x264, too.
> 
> Use --tune psnr or --tune ssim accordingly.  Note that VP8 by default
> is tuned for PSNR.
> 
> Dark Shikari
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel



More information about the x264-devel mailing list