[x264-devel] Who washed my video? x264 vs x265 ‘placebo’ comparison

[zhou2090 at 126.com]

hi,

"Hi, I don't compare PSNR because it's inconsistent with human eye 
perception. Even the structural similarity index is not as good as human 
eyes."

I totoaly agree with what you say. Now I'm intersting with the method how to evaluate the human eyes quality.

thanks.




zhou2090 at 126.com

From: Niccolò Belli
Date: 2014-02-24 19:57
To: x264-devel
Subject: Re: [x264-devel]Who washed my video? x264 vs x265 ‘placebo’ comparison
Il 24/02/2014 07:15, chen ha scritto:
> Hi,
> I see your blog, you just compare filesize, no PSNR, SSIM and more.

Hi, I don't compare PSNR because it's inconsistent with human eye 
perception. Even the structural similarity index is not as good as human 
eyes.

> For decode speed, I think H264 optimize more than 10 years, but H265 is
> shorter time, it is not a big problem.

I was serious, I'm impressed by the current encoding/decoding speeds. 
Especially compared to VP9 which seems to encode using a wooden abacus 
(~1.4 minutes per frame).

> btw: There have some decoder double speed than ffmpeg.
> Best regards,
> Min

Like Mainconcept? I don't like proprietary software.

Niccolò

> At 2014-02-24 04:32:54,"Niccolò Belli" <darkbasic at linuxsystems.it> wrote:
>  >Hi,
>  >I did a quick x264 vs x265 comparison in my blog, hopefully someone
>  >will be intersted watching it:
>  >http://www.linuxsystems.it/2014/02/washed-video-x264-vs-x265-placebo-comparison/
>  >
>  >Cheers,
>  >Niccolò
-- 
http://www.linuxsystems.it

_______________________________________________
x264-devel mailing list
x264-devel at videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20140225/3e634840/attachment.html>