[x264-devel] Warning: gpac is too old, update to 2007-06-21 UTC or later

[E R]

It was my understanding in the past that gpac for mp4 muxing allows
what ffmpeg can't do...



On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:16 PM,  <edgar.soldin at web.de> wrote:
> why not use ffmpeg in the first place? ..ede
>
> On 25.11.2014 07:12, E R wrote:
>> I got tired of messing with gpac and went with L-SMASH instead...
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Henrik Gramner <henrik at gramner.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dom, 2014-11-23 at 22:36 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>>>>> On 23 Nov, E R wrote :
>>>>>> I'm trying to get x264 to compile in gpac support (mp4), and I've
>>>>>> tried 3 different versions of gpac with no success, as well as 2
>>>>>> different snapshot versions of x264.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is clearly not the right mailing list for this.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure what's going on, but was told to add in ldflags for -lssl
>>>>>> and -lcrypto, so I added them like this to the ./configure options but
>>>>>> they didn't work;
>>>>>
>>>>> Building a binary with x264 (GPLv2) and OpenSSL is clearly not
>>>>> distributable.
>>>>
>>>> why ?
>>>> what do you mean about x264 (GPLv2) and OpenSSL is not distributable ?
>>>
>>> OpenSSL is not GPL-compatible, therefore a GPL binary linked to
>>> OpenSSL cannot be legally distributed.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> x264-devel mailing list
>>> x264-devel at videolan.org
>>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> x264-devel mailing list
>> x264-devel at videolan.org
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel