[x264-devel] [PATCH 1/3] checkasm: Try different widths for ssd_nv12

Martin Storsjö martin at martin.st
Thu Aug 13 23:00:57 CEST 2015


To test all codepaths in the aarch64 neon implementation, one at
the very least needs to test with width 8, 16, 24 and 32.
---
 tools/checkasm.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/checkasm.c b/tools/checkasm.c
index a1e8eda..185b98b 100644
--- a/tools/checkasm.c
+++ b/tools/checkasm.c
@@ -712,13 +712,16 @@ static int check_pixel( int cpu_ref, int cpu_new )
         used_asm = 1;
         set_func_name( "ssd_nv12" );
         uint64_t res_u_c, res_v_c, res_u_a, res_v_a;
-        pixel_c.ssd_nv12_core(   pbuf1, 368, pbuf2, 368, 360, 8, &res_u_c, &res_v_c );
-        pixel_asm.ssd_nv12_core( pbuf1, 368, pbuf2, 368, 360, 8, &res_u_a, &res_v_a );
-        if( res_u_c != res_u_a || res_v_c != res_v_a )
+        for( int w = 8; w <= 360; w += 8 )
         {
-            ok = 0;
-            fprintf( stderr, "ssd_nv12: %"PRIu64",%"PRIu64" != %"PRIu64",%"PRIu64"\n",
-                     res_u_c, res_v_c, res_u_a, res_v_a );
+            pixel_c.ssd_nv12_core(   pbuf1, 368, pbuf2, 368, w, 8, &res_u_c, &res_v_c );
+            pixel_asm.ssd_nv12_core( pbuf1, 368, pbuf2, 368, w, 8, &res_u_a, &res_v_a );
+            if( res_u_c != res_u_a || res_v_c != res_v_a )
+            {
+                ok = 0;
+                fprintf( stderr, "ssd_nv12: %"PRIu64",%"PRIu64" != %"PRIu64",%"PRIu64"\n",
+                         res_u_c, res_v_c, res_u_a, res_v_a );
+            }
         }
         call_c( pixel_c.ssd_nv12_core,   pbuf1, (intptr_t)368, pbuf2, (intptr_t)368, 360, 8, &res_u_c, &res_v_c );
         call_a( pixel_asm.ssd_nv12_core, pbuf1, (intptr_t)368, pbuf2, (intptr_t)368, 360, 8, &res_u_a, &res_v_a );
-- 
1.7.10.4



More information about the x264-devel mailing list