[x264-devel] Need help to understand a piece of code
Lingjiang Fang
vacingfang at foxmail.com
Tue Feb 2 05:55:07 UTC 2021
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:39:36 +0300
BugMaster <BugMaster at narod.ru> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 23:04:12 +0800, Lingjiang Fang wrote:
>
>
> > The code below puzzled me for a long time, can any give an
> > explanation for it ?
>
> > ...
>
> > I think this code want to solve the vbv overflow after
> > the current miniGOP, space is the predicted overflow size if there
> > is no consumption.
> > But if we discard the cost of bbits, it means we tend
> > to decrease q and leak more bits from vbv buffer, won't it leads to
> > vbv underflow?
>
> Hi. By discard of the bbits do you mean this part?
>
> if( bbits * nb > bframe_cpb_duration * rcc->vbv_max_rate )
> nb = 0;
>
> Yes, this part looks incorrect and was broken in:
> https://code.videolan.org/videolan/x264/-/commit/bb9b16b4722a1273885367f13f448516efe47ed1#2774abc5b23616ba88d9b08fa263902575a84d75_1714_1865
> It zeros B-frame bits in pbbits but doesn't zeros their duration in
> minigop_cpb_duration. Here is patch to fix it:
> https://code.videolan.org/BugMaster/x264/-/commit/a7e2c6ab8ff884e90f47a03258756fb0ad9f2e06
By zero bframe_cpb_duration, do you mean we don't need to consider
bframes if their consumptions larger than max input bits, and just
guarantee p frame won't cause overflow?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
Regards,
Lingjiang Fang
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list