[x264-devel] [PATCH] Add x264_cpu_detect() for NetBSD/macppc.
BugMaster
BugMaster at narod.ru
Sun Aug 6 20:15:48 UTC 2023
On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:57:43 +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> The altivec instruction set detection is very similar to FreeBSD
> and OpenBSD, but uses slightly different sysctl selectors.
> Without this change there is no x264_cpu_detect() function compiled
> for NetBSD/macppc and linking fails.
> ---
> common/cpu.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/common/cpu.c b/common/cpu.c
> index 41a4c1d7..9acb37e8 100644
> --- a/common/cpu.c
> +++ b/common/cpu.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ uint32_t x264_cpu_detect( void )
>
> #elif HAVE_ALTIVEC
>
> -#if SYS_MACOSX || SYS_OPENBSD || SYS_FREEBSD
> +#if SYS_MACOSX || SYS_OPENBSD || SYS_FREEBSD || SYS_NETBSD
>
> uint32_t x264_cpu_detect( void )
> {
> @@ -320,6 +320,8 @@ uint32_t x264_cpu_detect( void )
> size_t length = sizeof( has_altivec );
> #if SYS_MACOSX || SYS_OPENBSD
> int error = sysctl( selectors, 2, &has_altivec, &length, NULL, 0 );
> +#elif SYS_NETBSD
> + int error = sysctlbyname( "machdep.altivec", &has_altivec, &length, NULL, 0 );
> #else
> int error = sysctlbyname( "hw.altivec", &has_altivec, &length, NULL, 0 );
> #endif
Hi. Shouldn't it be the same as for SYS_OPENBSD i.e. to use sysctl
with selectors and not sysctlbyname? Does NetBSD have this constants?
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list