[dvblast-devel] EIT - why setting last_table_id to zero?
Andy Gatward
a.j.gatward at reading.ac.uk
Mon Sep 28 20:04:39 CEST 2009
-----Original Message-----
From: Marian Ďurkovič [mailto:md at bts.sk]
Sent: 24 September 2009 11:10
Subject: FWD: [dvblast-devel] EIT - why setting last_table_id to zero?
> just wonder if you had chance to read this email - could you please
> comment whether clearing EIT last_table_id has some special purpose
> or if this could be removed?
Sorry, I have been away and turned mail list delivery off...
You are correct that it can be removed - it was left behind when I changed how we were doing the EIT pass-through.
Patch attached; I think this should still apply after your other patches (maybe with some slight offset on one line).
Best wishes,
Andy.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dvblast-r17-eit-last-table-clean.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1210 bytes
Desc: dvblast-r17-eit-last-table-clean.patch
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/dvblast-devel/attachments/20090928/ba9f09e6/attachment.obj>
More information about the dvblast-devel
mailing list