[vlc-devel] Re: On the road to 0.5.0
Jean-Alexis Montignies
ja at sente.ch
Fri Jan 31 10:42:01 CET 2003
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:44:44 +0100
Sam Hocevar <sam at zoy.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>
> > - set CVS version to 0.5.0-test4,
> >
> > - downgrade major bugs that are not so major, upgrade normal bugs
> > that are rather important,
> > - fix all critical bugs,
> > - fix all major bugs,
> > - go back to previous step,
>
> This has gone very well so far. The OS X guys have fixed almost every
> problem they had, gibalou fixed a lot of data corruption issues, and well
> pretty everyone did a great job. Only three bugs are marked "major", but
> two of them are old 0.4.x bugs that have probably disappeared. The third
> might be in libfaad2.
>
> Can anyone think of bugs that are not in Bugzilla? Of normal bugs
> that should be major?
Yes there is still this audio bug, I've reported it on the list, but at that
time I hadn't found the bugzilla. I'm not sure someone did put it in bugzilla.
If you search the archive you will find two messages from me with subjects:
- 0.5.0test3 reports on MacOS X
- Audio on MacOS X log
The major bugs in my opinion:
*The audio does not work on my multichannel audio interface. (Well it was not
working with 0.4.6 anyway)
*The sound quality is bad (more like 64kbps mp3 than hi-fi). It was good in
0.4.6
The last version I checked was the sources from sunday morning.
I don't know if this bugs were added to bugzilla. I can do it if needed.
Jean-Alexis Montignies
http://www.sente.ch/
--
This is the vlc-devel mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list