[vlc-devel] [RFC] Regarding the use of *_Control()
Jean-Paul Saman
jpsaman at videolan.org
Tue Apr 15 16:55:18 CEST 2008
Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Jean-Paul Saman wrote:
>
>>> Do we agree that I should remap *_Control() as a first step?
>> I think it is premature to do that now. It is my feeling that there
>> are
>> still things (fundamentally) very wrong or broken in git. Let us
>> focus
>> on fixing that first, before rewrite internal module ABI's. Which will
>> definitely destabilize vlc more (at least temporarily) and make it
>> harder to get git in a sensible state.
>>
>>> Eventually an other RFC will follow.
>> First RFC then remapping and rewritting (has my preference).
>
> Well, to be honest, I don't agree here. That's not the point of the
> first RFC. The first RFC, is about sanitizing a bit the use of
> *_Control(), speaking of the code, not about architecture.
>
> So it's not about rewritting.
>
> Whereas a full architecture rewrite should be postponed or developed
> separately, a code cleanup doesn't need such a harsh measure.
>
> Hence, it's problematic to tell, "please don't do cleanup, because you
> shouldn't do clean up but full architecture rewrite, and architecture
> rewrite means code breakage, so please don't do".
>
> Do you get my point? Did I miss yours?
You missed mine and I got yours. So now we are full circle and it is
time to end this discussion.
Gtz
Jean-Paul Saman.
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list