[vlc-devel] [PATCH] Fix-for-TS-Muxer-memory-leak (Part II)
Robert Krakora
rob.krakora at messagenetsystems.com
Sat Nov 14 23:16:56 CET 2009
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb at videolan.org>wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 02:12:30PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote :
> > Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 19:29:44 Robert Krakora, vous avez écrit :
> > > All:
> > >
> > > I found the my first attempt at a memory leak fix still allowed for a
> slow
> > > leak and was very aggressive. Now that I understand the nature of the
> > > problem, I have developed a second patch to address the problem and the
> > > leak no longer occurs. Remi suggested that this same problem may
> exist in
> > > all of the muxers. I made a couple of assumptions when formulating
> this
> > > patch so it may or may not cover all transport stream scenarios
> possible
> > > with VLC. ;-)
> >
> > What do we do about this? This is a well-known bug.
>
> Does anyone has a diff ?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf
> http://www.jbkempf.com/
> _______________________________________________
> vlc-devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>
>
Jean-Baptiste:
I applied my own patch to fix this for 0.9.9a. It appears to work.
However, it does need some more work because it makes a couple of
assumptions in it's implementation. Do you want the diff against 0,9,9a?
It can be migrated to the 1.0.x.
Best Regards,
--
Rob Krakora
Senior Software Engineer
MessageNet Systems
101 East Carmel Dr. Suite 105
Carmel, IN 46032
(317)566-1677 Ext. 206
(317)663-0808 Fax
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20091114/6f20278f/attachment.html>
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list