juha.jeronen at jyu.fi
Mon Apr 11 11:41:13 CEST 2011
On 04/10/2011 12:37 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:43:07PM +0300, Yuval Tze wrote :
>> Should I try to do it anyway or should I stick to "sub-filter2" as the new
>> filter name (which will lead to confusing code, but at least won't break
> Could we have people's opinion on this?
Since "video-filter" filters video, it would be logical that
"sub-filter" would filter subs. The suggested "sub-source" also makes
intuitive sense, as those filters are a source for new subs.
I have no opinion on the backward compatibility issue.
More information about the vlc-devel