[vlc-devel] The case for 2.0

[Kaarlo Räihä]

2012/1/6 Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb at videolan.org>

> Hello,
>
> I strongly believe that we should rename VLC 1.2, aka Twoflower, as 2.0.
>

I promised people that VLC 1.2.x would be the next stable release =)


>
> First, that would be to match "Twoflower" name :)
>
> Then, VLC 1.2 is way beyond and different from 1.1... We have closed
> more than 10% of the bugs on the bugtracker during this long period.
> So many things have changed, that a stronger rupture should be done,
> IMVHO.
>
> Then, it is more simple for users to understand than our scheme.
>
> Then, we have a scheme of one stable/one trunk, so we only need x.y as a
> numbering.
>

So it would be 2.1, 2.2 ... 2.11 ?


>
> Then, the change to LGPL of libVLC is quite important.
>
> Finally, there is no finally :D
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Kempf
> http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
> Sent from my Electronic Device
> _______________________________________________
> vlc-devel mailing list
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20120106/74ab6109/attachment.html>