[vlc-devel] [vlc-commits] Tag 2.2.3 : VLC media player 2.2.3 'WeatherWax'

[Jean-Baptiste Kempf]

On 26 Apr, Rafaël Carré wrote :
> >> I am not coming in person to Vienna so there is no point in waiting the
> >> Vienna meeting.
> > 
> > Sorry, but why are you not coming?
> > If you are a main maintainer and root, not coming to the quarter
> > meetings is not cool.
> 
> I have upcoming real-life impediments.

Too bad. But I'm not responsible for this.

> > Sure. It was explained to you and this list why it was removed, with
> > quite a few details... Stop doing non-roots things as roots, that's
> > all...
> 
> At no point you mentioned removing my access.
> I would certainly have disagreed over this.

Read my email again then. on this very ml.
You keep doing things as root in the main machine and inside the lxc.
You refuse to use the FTP incoming like all other maintainers.

> > Well, are you going to care about this platform and test it?
> 
> I am doing that already.

I disagree. I gave good proof of that in my previous email.

> Again, if there are win64 specific bugs I can and will help when I am
> made aware of them.

You need to read the forum, triage the bugs, edit the wiki. You, so far,
do none of those. Once again, see my previous email.

> This is however completely orthogonal of who is building the win64
> release binaries.

I don't see why you care so much of running one script.
And as Felix said, this was temporary, to do a quick build, because of
lack of time.

> >> - I be provided with all the necessary tools to provide them (signing
> >> certificate)
> > No objections, but see above.
> > 
> >> - All related matters be discussed on this mailing list
> > 
> > Sure.
> > 
> >> This is in my opinion a breach from j-b of our shared values, namely:
> >> - be collaborative
> >> - be respectful
> > 
> > Sorry, but you broke our values first. You don't maintain things, you
> > dont' come to meetings, you're almost not active anymore and you do
> > demands?
> 
> Being less active than in the past is not breaking shared values in itself.
> 
> Making retaliations for it certainly is, that is why I demand you
> explain yourself.

I already did. In a long email here and in this thread. I don't see what
else can I add.

Please discuss those at the next meeting, if you want.

> >> vs j-b in
> >> a fair manner and separate the interests of VideoLAN versus VideoLABS ?
> > 
> > simple, come to our meetings and explain the situation.
> > noone has more votes than anyone else.
> 
> I was there in FOSDEM and at no point you made any remark related to
> win64 or root
> usage to me.

I told you about win64 issues many times over the years. And I'm not
your mom or boss. If you don't care, that's fine. But don't expect
people to be impressed.
As for roots, the issues were post FOSDEM. And as I said, if you behave
correctly on goldeneye, see with thresh.

> If there were a real problem you would have mentioned it at FOSDEM, no?

You've been ignoring what I tell you since years, why would that change?


-- 
Jean-Baptiste Kempf
http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734
Sent from my Electronic Device