[vlc-devel] [PATCH 09/12] network: io: Remove VLA usages

Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen hugo at beauzee.fr
Fri Dec 11 12:01:48 CET 2020

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, at 11:28 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> > * VLA we don't really need.
> We do as already explained.

I'm sure there's a way to reduce the usages in more locations without a performance cost, but I really don't see VLA as a hard requirement, like _Generic or atomics.
I'll see if I find a more suitable approach for some of the usages in the core.

> There was a decision to *upgrade* to C++11 then C11. There never was a 
> decision to downgrade from C99 by cropping what C11 made optional. There's 
> been a lot of pretexts about how this is a conformance problem in VLC code, 
> but really this is all MSVC problems. It's a case of two people wanting to 
> force everybody else to use to change the coding standards agreed by the 
> community for their own personal wishes.

No, I am not forcing anything. If I had forced anything we'd probably be having a discussion about reverting, if not worse. 
I'm trying to improve VLC's support of MSVC but I'm not forcing anything.
And arguing that it's only 2 people wanting to support MSVC is a strange argument because off course nobody uses MSVC, it doesn't compile when using it. You can't lock people out and then claim that they are not here.

> Well no. This project does not work your way or the highway.

Given that you suggested that we fork VLC if we disagreed about MSVC support, it kind of seems that it sometimes is, but I'd rather find a compromise.

  Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
  hugo at beauzee.fr

More information about the vlc-devel mailing list