[vlc-devel] [PATCH v1 01/33] filter: add a function to do the picture filtering
Alexandre Janniaux
ajanni at videolabs.io
Mon Sep 28 10:12:34 CEST 2020
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:05:58AM +0200, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> On 2020-09-28 9:26, Alexandre Janniaux wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't really appreciate to be asked to write a full refactor
> > of the filter code (which is quite time consuming) only to have
> > someone rework the code differently before I submit my work. :(
> >
> > https://patches.videolan.org/patch/28297/
>
> I don't understand. Your patch is about adding close callback to the filter.
> This is unrelated to this patch or even the patchset which doesn't touch
> that part of the filters.
I've shared the work with you multiple times, but as written in the
discussion above, it's about reworking the filter_t interface into a
vtable interface, just like you did for the vout_display (which is
exactly when we talked about this last time).
Yes the patch I've sent is just about adding a close callback and it
would have been much easier done this way, since it would allow much
more incremental changes. Moving everything to a vtable is what is
asked in the discussion, and I've already mentionned what kind of work
it was in the patch above.
> I first switched filter_t to an op structure, which is painful too
> to bring at once (~80 filters), but I reached issues when it comes
> with function having multiple different pf_filter callback (especially,
> video converter) and didn't come up with a decision between not doing
> this, doing memory allocation of the vtable or a generic pf_filter
> switching the real filter functions.
> If you have other patches that impact what I changed then show them. You
> can't expect me to guess what you have done in private 2 months ago.
This patch and the discussion around them were both public and internal
to Videolabs, so I'm not sure what you did to not know about them.
Regards,
--
Alexandre Janniaux
Videolabs
More information about the vlc-devel
mailing list