[vlc-devel] VLC | wam32-emscripten: add initial support (!184)

Rémi Denis-Courmont remi at remlab.net
Mon Sep 13 08:41:03 UTC 2021


Hello,

I don't care to revert the MR. My point was that it's impossible to review properly while the two separate covered topic are not split into two MRs, not that the changes are right or wrong, which I cannot make my mind about.

Le 13 septembre 2021 09:21:41 GMT+01:00, "Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen" <hugo at beauzee.fr> a écrit :
>On Mon, Sep 13, 2021, at 10:04 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am asking for consensus, which is what was agreed when the TC was set 
>> up and explicitly restated by the president when gitlab was taken into 
>> use. And yes, consensus is basically a synonym for unanimity. 
>
>We understand those words very differently then
>
>> The whole 
>> point of the TC is to vote when consensus cannot be reached.
>> 
>
>The point of the TC is to resolve stalemates when they occur.
>
>> You have knowingly undermined the very fundation of the TC by both not 
>> notifying the other members and overruling its decision making process.
>
>I've explicitly asked you in the MR if you were OK with some of the changes made after your review. After about a month without reply, I took the liberty of closing those threads, as 
>the code being commented upon was unequivocally fixed or removed from the MR.
> 
> 
>> Instead you just relied on VideoLabs voting power to basically outvote 
>> any decision it wishes on gitlab.
>
>I actually see people in Videolabs as people capable of making their own choices. There are multiple examples of videolabs employees not agreeing with each other.
>
>> 
>> And then somebody (possibly you) forwarded internal TC messages to your 
>> CEO to threaten me and slander me in front of the rest of the TC after 
>> I called for your replacement. It is absolutely appalling that 
>> VideoLabs has fallen so low. It is now very clear that it considers VLC 
>> its own and will override the community if it goes in its way.
>
>Not me, but given you explicitly asked Videolabs to name a replacement I guess it makes sense that Videolabs knows about it.
>Regarding your choice of words and view of the reply, their yours.
>
>I really don't think I went over the line by merging that MR but if the community thinks I did, I'll gladly apologize and revert the MR. I have no issue in recognizing that I made a mistake, but I don't think that's the case here.
>
>> -- 
>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser 
>> ma brièveté.
>> _______________________________________________
>> vlc-devel mailing list
>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
>
>
>-- 
>  Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
>  hugo at beauzee.fr
>_______________________________________________
>vlc-devel mailing list
>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options:
>https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/vlc-devel
-- 
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc-devel/attachments/20210913/b7ffb5b3/attachment.html>


More information about the vlc-devel mailing list