Compatibility bug in libdvdread-0.9.2-videolan

[Heinrich Rebehn]

Alexis de Lattre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> 
>>To make things worse, the above tarball extracts as libdvdread-0.9.2, *not* 
>>libdvdread-0.9.2-videolan, so you are not aware, that you are using a hacked, 
>>"videolan" version. This happened to me, i installed libdvdread-0.9.2-videolan 
>>as i was told on your web page, and when i installed transcode several weeks 
>>later, i wondered why it didn't work!
> 
> 
> The only thing that was hacked in libdvdread-0.9.2-videolan is make
> libdvdread 0.9.2 able to link with libdvdcss.1 or .2 instead of only
> libdvdcss.0. It is a very small modification, and it should impact the
> functionnality of libdvdread.
> 
> But as Sam said, you'd better get the lastest version (0.9.3) from
> Ogle's web site.
> 

Yes, of course i can.
But i would really appreciate, if you could at least post a warning on 
http://www.videolan.org/vls/ that the lib you offer to download is not 
compatible and will cause problems with other apps. I have wasted quite a few 
days to find out and it would be good, if others could be warned.

-- 

Heinrich Rebehn


-- 
This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>