Jaguar and vlc

[adamgt at mac.com]

I am running a beta of QT6 in 10.1.4 and I have not had any problems 
with vlc.  I bet it is because Jaguar is in some sort of debug mode.  
Dev releases of OSs usually are much slower.  Remember OS X DP3 or DP4 
before the public beta?  Those were HORRIBLY slow (15-20 sec to just 
launch IE).

-Adam

On Saturday, May 11, 2002, at 03:31  PM, Kadari Mayson wrote:

> On 5/11/02 4:18 PM, "Christophe Massiot" <massiot at via.ecp.fr> wrote:
>
>> À (At) 21:21 -0400 9/05/2002, Kadari Mayson écrivait (wrote) :
>>
>>> Although I realize that it might be far too early to report this but 
>>> I tried
>>> Jaguar at work and found that vlc while stable, plays horribly on the 
>>> beta.
>>> Jaguar had QT 6 installed, I tried it on a dual 800, and there was no 
>>> video,
>>> it ate up 25% of the processor cycles when playing a VCD and ~90% when
>>> playing an SVCD.  Just thought I'd give you a bit of a heads up.
>>
>> Is it a beta build of Jaguar ? Maybe they have a log of debugging
>> code in this build which slows down everything.
>
> That certainly might be the case and you would know more than I, but the
> rest of the system is definitely faster than 10.1.x.  I don't have any
> official benchmarks, but once you use it, you can tell.  It feels much 
> like
> OS 9, and I'm speaking from personal experience.  Could it be that 
> itself
> QT6 is the culprit?
>
> The same application on the same machine works extremely well in 10.1.4.
>
> ./km
>
>
> --
> This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
> To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
> If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
>


-- 
This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>