[vlc] Re: vlc vs. vls

[ZERBIT]

Sorry, the last email was a private email.

 Regards

----- Mensaje Original -----
De: Benjamin Molina <benmomo at doctor.upv.es>
Fecha: Lunes, Septiembre 6, 2004 9:48 am
Asunto: [vlc] vlc vs. vls

> Hello,
> 
> I've been using vls and vlc for about a year in video streaming 
> applications.
> I know vls has been left appart for the rich and full of features vlc.
> However, vls is a small lightweight server whose encoding delay is 
> very 
> small compared to vlc :
> - vls delay is  practically unnoticeable
> - vlc delay is over a second
> Is it possible to reduce this delay in vlc ?
> Is it possible to reduce vlc size to a more lightweight server ? 
> Compiling vlc with the minimal requirements/libraries the size is 
> much 
> greater compared to vls compilation.
> I've been trying to understand the source code, but I don't know 
> which 
> parts add significant delay; besides, I find the documentation a 
> bit 
> hard for understanding how vlc/vls is developed.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Benjamin
> 
> -- 
> This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
> To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html
> 
> 


-- 
This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html