[vlc] Re: VLC vs QoS
Pablo Andrés Orellana Vega
pablo.orellana.vega at gmail.com
Fri Feb 16 13:18:17 CET 2007
ok Thnx!!!
regards!
Pablo O.
2007/2/15, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com>:
>
> Pablo Andrés Orellana Vega wrote:
> > sorry i dont understant the "lite"....
>
> It's a variant of UDP that lets peers say that only part of the packet
> is covered by the checksum. In regular UDP, the entire packet is
> covered by the checksum, so that if even one bit is damaged, the whole
> packet is discarded.
>
> This is useful in streaming media programs like VLC because if the
> damage is only in the media payload area (as opposed to RTP headers and
> such), it's usually better to pass it through as-is than to drop it. If
> you drop the whole packet, you get a big blip in the stream, but if you
> let a small bit of media corruption through, the blip might not even be
> noticed.
>
> Read this for more info:
>
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/1999/HPL-IRI-1999-001.pdf
>
> (It's the fourth result in a Google search for "UDP-lite". Hint, hint.)
>
> --
> This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
> To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/support/lists.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/vlc/attachments/20070216/057c48ed/attachment.html>
More information about the vlc
mailing list