[x264-devel] Re: Packaging libx264
Loren Merritt
lorenm at u.washington.edu
Sat Dec 11 11:06:00 CET 2004
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Arvind R. wrote:
> Some points that can be fixed early in the development:
> 1. The directory name 'core' interferes with the clean-hook.
> I've changed it to 'Core' but that may not be acceptable
> to case-insensitive systems.
I don't have a problem with renaming 'core' to 'common'.
Any other devs want to comment?
> 2. The use of relative paths in include-file specification;
> e.g.'#include "../something.h". This can be avoided
> by specifying search-paths for includes.
Agreed that it's ugly. I'll fix it.
> 3. Name clashes in core/i386 asm files.
You mean like 'core/mc.c' vs 'core/i386/mc.c'? (In which case there are
also clashes between core, encoder, and decoder.) I fail to see the
problem.
> Hope I've not been presumptious.
> - arvind
--Loren Merritt
--
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list