[x264-devel] Re: [patch] slightly faster quant

[Christian Heine]

Loren Merritt wrote:
> Just for the record: This is not MPlayer, and I have different patch 
> standards. Yes, splitting a patch into functional and cosmetic parts 
> would make it faster to review. But do not leave ugly code around just 
> in order to reduce patch size.

I'm sorry, but the patch wasn't getting through and I had to reduce 
patch size somewhere. Too late I got the idea of gzipping it. However, 
now the code is more readable.

Best regards,
Christian Heine

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: x264rev293-quant-mmx16-new.diff.gz
Type: application/gzip
Size: 3754 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20050922/3d48c929/attachment.bin