[x264-devel] Optimizing X264 with WMMX based on PXA270
Mike Bizub
mikebizub at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 22 21:16:06 CET 2007
What are your registry settings? I've seen a plain 'c' version of x264 do 3 - 12 fps on a Palm Treo 700wx but at 177x144.
Mike> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:58:51 +0100> From: poirierg at gmail.com> To: x264-devel at videolan.org> Subject: Re: [x264-devel] Optimizing X264 with WMMX based on PXA270> > Hello,> > On 11/17/07, Cheng Dennis <chengdennis at hotmail.com> wrote:> >> >> > I port the x264 on PXA270 using wMMX but performance too bad. it needs over> > 5 secs for a frame (352x288).> > That's quite possible, given that H.264 encoding is very> CPU-intensive, particularly if your encoding options target good> quality. Maybe you need to implement some more iWMMX routines too.> > Can you send a patch containing your changes to this mailing list?> > BTW, how did you manage to get your hands on a Xscale-powered machine?> I have been looking for a cheap way to get one, but I only found these> expensive dev board (Zaurus are long sold out here).> > Guillaume> -- > A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon.> -- Napoleon Bonaparte> _______________________________________________> x264-devel mailing list> x264-devel at videolan.org> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
_________________________________________________________________
You keep typing, we keep giving. Download Messenger and join the i’m Initiative now.
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TAGLM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20071122/d842f3aa/attachment.htm
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list