[x264-devel] [PATCH] fix more illegal identifiers
Guillaume POIRIER
poirierg at gmail.com
Fri Apr 25 13:56:20 CEST 2008
On 4/25/08, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Guillaume POIRIER wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Måns Rullgård <mans at mansr.com> wrote:
> > > Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> writes:
> > >
> > > > OK, here is the next patch to do $subject.
> > > >
>
> > > > --- a/gtk/x264_gtk.c
> > > > +++ b/gtk/x264_gtk.c
> > > > @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ x264_gtk_free (X264_Gtk *x264_gtk)
> > > > /* Callbacks */
> > > >
> > > > static void
> > > > -_dialog_run (GtkDialog *dialog __UNUSED__,
> > > > +_dialog_run (GtkDialog *dialog UNUSED,
> > >
> > > _dialog_run and similar names are also bad, since all identifiers
> > > beginning with _ are reserved at the file scope. _[a-z] is allowed
> > > for local variables and struct/union members.
> >
> > Yep, I noticed that too, I just figured that Diego had a separate
> > patch for that issue.
>
>
> No, I haven't, so feel free to beat me to it :)
Done, see attached patch. It should be Ok since it compiles OK and
seems to run likewise. Please someone have a look at it, one never
knows, a bug may have got in.
Guillaume
--
I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he
bounces when he hits bottom.
-- George S. Patton
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-Fix-define-of-illegal-function-identifiers-as-defin.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 39453 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20080425/b16b27e0/attachment-0001.obj
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list