[x264-devel] I444 support
Neil Woodall
vidsurfr at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 01:00:00 CET 2008
Transmission errors would be corruption of data. In a broadcast mode
it would not always be possible to ask the source to resend the data.
H.264 has a series of mechanisms to improve error resiliency. One of
the methods is to include redundant picture frames and with redundant
slices. Another would be to simply force a larger amount of the blocks
to be intra coded.
The point that I was trying to make is that if you have enough
bandwidth for M-JPEG2000, then you probably have enough bandwidth to
make sure that the H.264 is more resilient to errors than is normally
the case.
On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:03 PM, James Gardiner wrote:
>
> Can you please qualify,
> On this topic of 444 and quality compared to JPEG2000.
> Can you be more clear on what " transmission errors are"?
> I took them to mean in accuracies compared to the original.
> Then in other posts, it leads me to think you are talking about
> Real transmission errors as in what is characteristic of DVB-T or
> satellite.
>
> However, I am not sure how "transmitting them twice" actually means
> considering this.
>
> If you have time to clarify, this would be appreciated.
>
> James
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list