[x264-devel] Does x264 support multi-slice parallel encoding?

[Chengbin Zheng]

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Leon Liu <llfeng1999 at yahoo.cn> wrote:

> Because the current frame-based parallel encoding mechanism would result in
> latency in real-time video streaming application.And sliced-based parallel
> encoding can resolve this issue.
>
> Leon
>
> --- *09年10月12日，周一, Chengbin Zheng <chengbinzheng at gmail.com>* 写道：
>
>
> 发件人: Chengbin Zheng <chengbinzheng at gmail.com>
> 主题: Re: [x264-devel] Does x264 support multi-slice parallel encoding?
> 收件人: "Mailing list for x264 developers" <x264-devel at videolan.org>
> 日期: 2009年10月12日,周一,上午9:48
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Leon Liu <llfeng1999 at yahoo.cn<http://mc/compose?to=llfeng1999@yahoo.cn>
> > wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>    Very glad to hear that x264 support multi-slice encoding again,  and I
>> hope to know whether it can support slice based parallel encoding?
>>
>> Leon
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> 好玩贺卡等你发，邮箱贺卡全新上线！<http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tagline/card/*http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> x264-devel mailing list
>> x264-devel at videolan.org <http://mc/compose?to=x264-devel@videolan.org>
>> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>>
>>
> Why would you want that when the current multithread encoding option is
> better in every way?
>
> -----下面为附件内容-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org <http://mc/compose?to=x264-devel@videolan.org>
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------
> 好玩贺卡等你发，邮箱贺卡全新上线！<http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tagline/card/*http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
> I don't think so. I don't see that in the commits. I also recall DS saying
that adding slice based multithreading is a lot of work for almost no use.
Just curious, what kind of latency are we talking about? It can't be more
than 0.5 seconds.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20091011/c59a31cd/attachment-0001.htm>