[x264-devel] pic_struct / hrd patch
Trahald
wewk584 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 15:45:29 CEST 2009
I think your x264_vbv_fullness() routine is broken. initial cpb removal
delay is holding negative values. it is what is causing elecard to reject
the stream.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Alex Giladi <alex.giladi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone that sees a problem with this patch -- can you please provide
> some details?
> Thanks!
> Alex.
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jason Garrett-Glaser
> <darkshikari at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Alex Giladi <alex.giladi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Attached is the new version of the HRD patch with several changes due
> >> to the inputs from Dark_Shikari, Manao and Trahald.
> >> The two major fixes cpb_removal_delay for IDR frames and calculation
> >> of initial_cpb_removal_delay.
> >> Alex.
> >
> > From a guy with BD authoring software on Doom9:
> >
> >>Elecard and Sonic reject streams [using NAL-HRD pic struct v8 patch]
> completely, while Trahald's work fine up to rev16, because in later rev's
> (19) changed some calculations which crash x264 with GOP 24
> >
> > Dark Shikari
> > _______________________________________________
> > x264-devel mailing list
> > x264-devel at videolan.org
> > http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20091016/2cb580ea/attachment.htm>
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list