[x264-devel] interlace

[Jason Garrett-Glaser]

n Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Purvin Pandit <purvinp at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> From: darkshikari at gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:13:29 -0700
>> To: x264-devel at videolan.org
>> Subject: Re: [x264-devel] interlace
>>
>> > Thanks. Was there a reason x264 did not add support for field coding (or
>> > even PAFF) and preferred field MB coding instead? Is there any plan to
>> > add
>> > support for field coding? Are there any performance comparison of field
>> > coding versus field MB only that someone can point me to?
>>
>> Non-adaptive MBAFF was easier to implement and required less code than
>> field coding.
>>
>> Furthermore, it naturally leads into adaptive MBAFF, which is superior
>> to PAFF in most cases.
>
> Thanks. Is there a plan to support adaptive MBAFF in the near future?

Yes, it's a Google Summer of Code project this year.

Dark Shikari