[x264-devel] [PATCH] Fix linker test for -Bsymbolic

Sean McGovern gseanmcg at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 19:23:49 CEST 2011


That's what I figured -- OK so I should just add -mimpure-text to the
Solaris LDFLAGS and be done with it? If so, I'll send a patch this
evening.

-- Sean

On 4/19/11, BugMaster <BugMaster at narod.ru> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:51:52 -0400, Sean McGovern wrote:
>
>> Is copy-on-write something to be concerned about? Is the assembler
>> code in common/x86/ supposed to be at least PIC-friendly on x86_32?
>
> Look at this from x86inc.asm:
> %ifdef WIN64
>     %define PIC
> %elifndef ARCH_X86_64
> ; x86_32 doesn't require PIC.
> ; Some distros prefer shared objects to be PIC, but nothing breaks if
> ; the code contains a few textrels, so we'll skip that complexity.
>     %undef PIC
> %endif
>
> So if by PIC-friendly you mean "don't have textrels" than answer is
> "no".
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device


More information about the x264-devel mailing list