[x264-devel] x264-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 20

[Michel Valstar]

Let's say Feb. 3d, ok? Then we can probably deal with most submissions on
Friday the 4th, before we have to make the decisions of paper acceptance.

Best,

Michel

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:00 AM, x264-devel-request at videolan.org <
x264-devel-request at videolan.org> wrote:

> Send x264-devel mailing list submissions to
>        x264-devel at videolan.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        x264-devel-request at videolan.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        x264-devel-owner at videolan.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of x264-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: [PATCH] MPEG2 Program Stream output (Gil Pedersen)
>   2. Re: [PATCH] MPEG2 Program Stream output (Kieran Kunhya)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 11:29:18 +0100
> From: Gil Pedersen <gil at cmi.aau.dk>
> To: Mailing list for x264 developers <x264-devel at videolan.org>
> Subject: Re: [x264-devel] [PATCH] MPEG2 Program Stream output
> Message-ID: <D8FA6C7F-B31F-4B5F-BE65-9CC3CFC0CB7E at cmi.aau.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On 21/01/2011, at 17.34, Lorenzo Pallara wrote:
>
> Attached patch is to add MPEG2 Program Stream output to x264.
>
> My proposal is to use ".pes" as filename extension as I can't find a
> more popular one.
>
> Looking at the code I can see that it's not an MPEG2 Program Stream you
> output, but rather a "PES Stream". A proper program stream will need some
> header and trailer bytes and should have a number of additional "pack"
> headers.
>
> Naming aside, I'm a bit concerned that you never calculate and specify the
> PES_packet_length. As far as I can tell, according to 13818-1, this is only
> allowed if you encapsulate the PES Stream into Transport Stream packets, but
> not Program Stream packets.
>
> Regards,
> Gil
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20110125/cd0771a6/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:52:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Kieran Kunhya <kieran at kunhya.com>
> To: Mailing list for x264 developers <x264-devel at videolan.org>
> Subject: Re: [x264-devel] [PATCH] MPEG2 Program Stream output
> Message-ID: <658551.60907.qm at web120705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> > Last concern is about the starting time not at zero when
> > --vbv-init
> > is zero, any hints ?
>
> I thought about it a bit just to make sure there wasn't some magic hrd
> thing
> that made this possible. But a --vbv-init of zero is meaningless I think
> because it means you end up decoding a frame from a buffer that is empty.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
>
> End of x264-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 20
> ******************************************
>



-- 
Dr. Michel Valstar, Research Associate
http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~mvalstar
Intelligent Behaviour Understanding Group
Department of Computing
Imperial College London
180 Queens' Gate
London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

tel.: +44 20 7594 8336
fax: +44 (0)20 7594  8932
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20110125/c200a37a/attachment.html>