[x264-devel] Intel Compiler support
Steven Walters
kemuri9 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 00:02:58 CET 2011
you appear to be initializing icc in a odd way,
the proper way is to use the proper iccvars.sh script to initialize
the environment,
not simply add icc's bin folder to the path.
Also, I tested the committed patch against 11.1 and 12.0 on my debian
system and there were no issues such as this.
Looks like i'll need to get my debian system back up and running after
it went down from an upgrade to squeeze...
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Dennis Munsie <dmunsie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just tried the patch out -- worked perfectly.
>
> Thanks for the quick turnaround, very much appreciated.
>
> dennis
>
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, BugMaster wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:50:37 -0400, Dennis Munsie wrote:
>>> That was the problem -- I'm downloading the latest version as I
>>> speak, but is there any reason in particular that the version in git
>>> couldn't default to c99 instead of gnu99?
>>
>>> Also, in my quick testing using some of my own code I have around,
>>> I didn't see any improvement in performance when compiling libx264
>>> with icc instead of gcc. I'm guessing that has more to do with my
>>> own code than anything else, but I was curious if there were any
>>> improvements (or slowdowns, even) seen in x264 because of the switch to icc?
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> dennis
>>
>> Before trying new version of icc please check would this patch fix the
>> problem (correctly detect that -std=gnu99 not supported).<patch.diff>_______________________________________________
>> x264-devel mailing list
>> x264-devel at videolan.org
>> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> x264-devel mailing list
> x264-devel at videolan.org
> http://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x264-devel
>
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list