[x264-devel] x264: 10 bit builds

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2012-11-20 at 23:48 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio at serjux.com> wrote:
> > On Ter, 2012-11-20 at 20:38 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> >> Le decadi 30 brumaire, an CCXXI, Sérgio Basto a écrit :
> >> > Hi, I'm one of the maintainers of x264 on rpmfusion.org
> >> >
> >> > so for next release of Fedora we have:
> >> > /usr/lib64/libx264.so.125
> >> > /usr/lib64/libx26410b.so.125
> >>
> >> That makes selecting the version to use with LD_LIBRARY_PATH impossible. Is
> >> it on purpose?
> >>
> >
> > You may choose use -llibx264 or -llibx26410b though
> 
> Please have a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667573
> 
> i did not upload that change to the debian package due to the freeze
> yet, but do you see any problems with this approach? Ideally the
> situation would be consistent in both Fedora & Debian. What do you
> think?

Hi, I have rejoin to this mailing list to ask other thing, when I read
this messages about "x264: 10 bit builds", I though that should share
our work, on this matter. 
On this link https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2227#c0
you have the RFE 
"The next vlc will expect an usual x264 to provides 8bit and a special
x26410b to provides 10bit encoding. "

So I think, for now, just (next) VLC need 10bit and expect x26410b ... 
So I prefer our approach, which not depend on LD_LIBRARY_PATH but just
in the name of so, without conflicts. 
I will read in more detail the Debian bug report, when I have free
time ... 

Best regards, 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.