[x264-devel] Worse PSNR with --subme 9 and --subme 11

[Николай Рыжков]

Greetings

2013/11/5 <x264-devel-request at videolan.org>

> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Raul Lopez <raulizahi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am trying to improve the PSNR quantitative video quality of x264 by
> > reducing or eliminating early terminations but I actually get worse PSNR
> > results:
>
> You're not using --tune psnr, so it's not surprising that "better"
> settings don't give better PSNR, as x264 isn't tuning for it.
>

Are -tune film or -tune animation better for visual quality?
How can I understand visual quality without view result?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x264-devel/attachments/20131105/f51abd6e/attachment.html>