[x264-devel] [PATCH 3/3] RFC: checkasm: Compare the combined sa8d_satd functions against the individual functions
Henrik Gramner
henrik at gramner.com
Thu Aug 27 20:50:20 CEST 2015
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote:
> This shows the actual benefit of using the combined version, versus
> just calling the individual asm functions one at a time.
We already benchmark the separate functions individually, so isn't
this the same as just adding the cycle counters for sa8d and satd?
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list