[x264-devel] [PATCH 3/3] RFC: checkasm: Compare the combined sa8d_satd functions against the individual functions

Martin Storsjö martin at martin.st
Thu Aug 27 21:47:50 CEST 2015


On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Henrik Gramner wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote:
>> This shows the actual benefit of using the combined version, versus
>> just calling the individual asm functions one at a time.
>
> We already benchmark the separate functions individually, so isn't
> this the same as just adding the cycle counters for sa8d and satd?

Yes, pretty much. It's mostly for covenience to be able to do 
--bench=sa8d_satd and directly see how it fares.

// Martin


More information about the x264-devel mailing list