[x265] [PATCH] unit test code for scale1D_128to64

Steve Borho steve at borho.org
Thu Nov 14 02:13:47 CET 2013


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:02 AM, <murugan at multicorewareinc.com> wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User Murugan Vairavel <murugan at multicorewareinc.com>
> # Date 1384354925 -19800
> #      Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013 +0530
> # Node ID ae46503b8f94b89300c2fcd027fbc30bcc6136eb
> # Parent  29f7e68d450f0b71153f6bf5794ae4d1c118ac55
> unit test code for scale1D_128to64
>
> diff -r 29f7e68d450f -r ae46503b8f94 source/common/pixel.cpp
> --- a/source/common/pixel.cpp   Wed Nov 13 20:30:26 2013 +0530
> +++ b/source/common/pixel.cpp   Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013 +0530
> @@ -974,6 +974,9 @@
>      p.pixeladd_ss = pixeladd_ss_c;
>
>      p.scale1D_128to64 = scale1D_128to64;
> +
> +    p.scale_1D_128to64 = scale1D_128to64;
>

why is a new function pointer necessary?


> +
>      p.scale2D_64to32 = scale2D_64to32;
>      p.frame_init_lowres_core = frame_init_lowres_core;
>      p.ssim_4x4x2_core = ssim_4x4x2_core;
> diff -r 29f7e68d450f -r ae46503b8f94 source/common/primitives.h
> --- a/source/common/primitives.h        Wed Nov 13 20:30:26 2013 +0530
> +++ b/source/common/primitives.h        Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013 +0530
> @@ -281,6 +281,9 @@
>
>      scale_t         scale1D_128to64;
>      scale_t         scale2D_64to32;
> +
> +    scale_t         scale_1D_128to64;
> +
>      downscale_t     frame_init_lowres_core;
>      ssim_end4_t     ssim_end_4;
>      var_t           var[NUM_LUMA_PARTITIONS];
> diff -r 29f7e68d450f -r ae46503b8f94 source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp
> --- a/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp      Wed Nov 13 20:30:26 2013
> +0530
> +++ b/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp      Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013
> +0530
> @@ -411,6 +411,8 @@
>          // until all partitions are coded and commit smaller patches,
> easier to
>          // review.
>
> +        p.scale_1D_128to64 = x265_scale_1D_128to64_sse2;
> +
>          p.chroma_copy_sp[CHROMA_4x2] = x265_blockcopy_sp_4x2_sse2;
>          p.chroma_copy_sp[CHROMA_4x4] = x265_blockcopy_sp_4x4_sse2;
>          p.chroma_copy_sp[CHROMA_4x8] = x265_blockcopy_sp_4x8_sse2;
> diff -r 29f7e68d450f -r ae46503b8f94 source/common/x86/pixel.h
> --- a/source/common/x86/pixel.h Wed Nov 13 20:30:26 2013 +0530
> +++ b/source/common/x86/pixel.h Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013 +0530
> @@ -117,6 +117,8 @@
>  int x265_pixel_satd_16x32_sse2(pixel *, intptr_t, pixel *, intptr_t);
>  int x265_pixel_satd_16x64_sse2(pixel *, intptr_t, pixel *, intptr_t);
>
> +void x265_scale_1D_128to64_sse2(pixel *, pixel *, intptr_t);
> +
>  DECL_PIXELS(uint64_t, var, mmx2, (pixel * pix, intptr_t i_stride))
>  DECL_PIXELS(uint64_t, var, sse2, (pixel * pix, intptr_t i_stride))
>  DECL_PIXELS(uint64_t, var, avx,  (pixel * pix, intptr_t i_stride))
> diff -r 29f7e68d450f -r ae46503b8f94 source/test/pixelharness.cpp
> --- a/source/test/pixelharness.cpp      Wed Nov 13 20:30:26 2013 +0530
> +++ b/source/test/pixelharness.cpp      Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013 +0530
> @@ -586,6 +586,29 @@
>      return true;
>  }
>
> +bool PixelHarness::check_scale_pixel_t(scale_t ref, scale_t opt)
> +{
> +    ALIGN_VAR_16(pixel, ref_dest[64 * 64]);
> +    ALIGN_VAR_16(pixel, opt_dest[64 * 64]);
> +
> +    memset(ref_dest, 0, sizeof(ref_dest));
> +    memset(opt_dest, 0, sizeof(opt_dest));
> +
> +    int j = 0;
> +    for (int i = 0; i < ITERS; i++)
> +    {
> +        opt(opt_dest, pbuf1 + j, STRIDE);
> +        ref(ref_dest, pbuf1 + j, STRIDE);
> +
> +        if (memcmp(ref_dest, opt_dest, 64 * 64 * sizeof(pixel)))
> +            return false;
> +
> +        j += INCR;
> +    }
> +
> +    return true;
> +}
> +
>  bool PixelHarness::testPartition(int part, const EncoderPrimitives& ref,
> const EncoderPrimitives& opt)
>  {
>      if (opt.satd[part])
> @@ -880,6 +903,15 @@
>              return false;
>          }
>      }
> +
> +    if (opt.scale_1D_128to64)
> +    {
> +        if (!check_scale_pixel_t(ref.scale_1D_128to64,
> opt.scale_1D_128to64))
> +        {
> +            printf("scale1D_128to64 failed!\n");
> +            return false;
> +        }
> +    }
>      return true;
>  }
>
> @@ -1093,4 +1125,10 @@
>          printf("downscale");
>          REPORT_SPEEDUP(opt.frame_init_lowres_core,
> ref.frame_init_lowres_core, pbuf2, pbuf1, pbuf2, pbuf3, pbuf4, 64, 64, 64,
> 64);
>      }
> +
> +    if (opt.scale_1D_128to64)
> +    {
> +        printf("scale_1D_128to64");
> +        REPORT_SPEEDUP(opt.scale_1D_128to64, ref.scale_1D_128to64, pbuf2,
> pbuf1, 64);
> +    }
>  }
> diff -r 29f7e68d450f -r ae46503b8f94 source/test/pixelharness.h
> --- a/source/test/pixelharness.h        Wed Nov 13 20:30:26 2013 +0530
> +++ b/source/test/pixelharness.h        Wed Nov 13 20:32:05 2013 +0530
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@
>      bool check_blockfill_s(blockfill_s_t ref, blockfill_s_t opt);
>
>      bool check_pixel_sub_ps(pixel_sub_ps_t ref, pixel_sub_ps_t opt);
> +
> +    bool check_scale_pixel_t(scale_t ref, scale_t opt);
>  public:
>
>      PixelHarness();
> _______________________________________________
> x265-devel mailing list
> x265-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
>



-- 
Steve Borho
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/attachments/20131113/46ec885e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the x265-devel mailing list