[x265] [PATCH] asm: fix overflow due to pixel_satd asm function for 64-bit build

[Steve Borho]

On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:47 AM, chen <chenm003 at 163.com> wrote:

> His hg setting have some problem, need delete date information after filename
> I may apply it to
>    "me: add a two pixel pad to the max ME range when calculating reference lag"

The dates don't seem to be the problem, hg import ignores them but even using hg import --exact, which tries to apply the patch onto the parent revision documented in the header, it doesn't apply cleanly.  There's a large chunk of line deletes from the asm fie which are rejected.  The lines being removed by the patch don't exist in the parent documented in the header. I'm real curious how the patch was made.

--
Steve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/attachments/20140128/f830145b/attachment.html>