[x265] [PATCH] asm: intrapred dc8 sse2 high bit

dave dtyx265 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 26 22:36:45 CET 2015


On 02/25/2015 05:59 AM, chen wrote:
> At 2015-02-25 08:16:44,dtyx265 at gmail.com wrote:
> ># HG changeset patch
> ># User David T Yuen <dtyx265 at gmail.com>
> ># Date 1424823199 28800
> ># Node ID bd1d713da87bb1e3022c80f462398bd78a95ce48
> ># Parent  644d27ca0b197455393171ba705b1190f3d9b420
> >asm: intrapred dc8 sse2 high bit
> >
> >This replaces c code for systems using ssse3 to sse2 processors
> >The code is backported from intrapred dc8 sse4 high bit
> >
> >./test/TestBench --testbench intrapred | grep 8x8
> >intra_dc_8x8[f=0]	1.62x 	 443.94   	 717.32
> >intra_dc_8x8[f=1]	1.59x 	 729.98   	 1157.66
> >
> >diff -r 644d27ca0b19 -r bd1d713da87b source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp
> >--- a/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp	Tue Feb 24 14:47:01 2015 -0800
> >+++ b/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp	Tue Feb 24 16:13:19 2015 -0800
> >@@ -864,6 +864,7 @@
> >         ALL_LUMA_TU_S(transpose, transpose, sse2);
> >
> >         p.cu[BLOCK_4x4].intra_pred[DC_IDX] = x265_intra_pred_dc4_sse2;
> >+        p.cu[BLOCK_8x8].intra_pred[DC_IDX] = x265_intra_pred_dc8_sse2;
> >
> >         p.cu[BLOCK_4x4].sse_ss = x265_pixel_ssd_ss_4x4_mmx2;
> >         ALL_LUMA_CU(sse_ss, pixel_ssd_ss, sse2);
> >diff -r 644d27ca0b19 -r bd1d713da87b source/common/x86/intrapred16.asm
> >--- a/source/common/x86/intrapred16.asm	Tue Feb 24 14:47:01 2015 -0800
> >+++ b/source/common/x86/intrapred16.asm	Tue Feb 24 16:13:19 2015 -0800
> >@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
> > cextern pw_8
> > cextern pw_16
> > cextern pw_1023
> >+cextern pd_2
> > cextern pd_16
> > cextern pd_32
> > cextern pw_4096
> >@@ -166,6 +167,89 @@
> > ;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ; void intra_pred_dc(pixel* dst, intptr_t dstStride, pixel* above, int, int filter)
> > ;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >+INIT_XMM sse2
> >+cglobal intra_pred_dc8, 5, 8, 2
> >+    add             r2,            2
> >+    add             r1,            r1
> >+    movu            m0,            [r2 + 32]
> >+    movu            m1,            [r2]
> >+
> >+    paddw           m0,            m1
> >+    movhlps         m1,            m0
> >+    paddw           m0,            m1
> >+    pshufd          m1,            m0, 1
> >+    paddw           m0,            m1
> >+    pmaddwd         m0,            [pw_1]
> >+
> >+    paddw           m0,            [pw_8]
> >+    psraw           m0,            4              ; sum = sum / 16
> >+    pshuflw         m0,            m0, 0
> >+    pshufd          m0,            m0, 0          ; m0 = word [dc_val ...]
> >+
> >+    test            r4d,           r4d
> >+
> >+    ; store DC 8x8
> >+    lea             r6,            [r1 + r1 * 2]
> >+    lea             r5,            [r6 + r1 * 2]
> >+    lea             r7,            [r6 + r1 * 4]
> >+    movu            [r0],          m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r1],     m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r1 * 2], m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r6],     m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r1 * 4], m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r5],     m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r6 * 2], m0
> >+    movu            [r0 + r7],     m0
> >+
> >+    ; Do DC Filter
> >+    jz              .end
> >+    mova            m1,            [pd_2]
> >+    pmullw          m1,            m0
> [x x x x] * [0 2 0 2] = [0 dc*2 0 dc*2], am I right?
> Why not PSLL?
For some reason using psllw in place of pmullw hurts performance of 
unfiltered in 8 and 10 bit far more than you would expect for such a 
small change.  8 bit speed is cut by more than half

./test/TestBench --testbench intrapred | grep 8x8

intra_dc_8x8[f=0]    1.84x      492.58        906.63
intra_dc_8x8[f=1]    2.38x      537.68        1280.02

  and 10 bit is barely faster than c code.

./test/TestBench --testbench intrapred | grep 8x8
intra_dc_8x8[f=0]    1.06x      677.54        719.80
intra_dc_8x8[f=1]    1.60x      725.05        1157.54

I will resubmit with other adjustments
> >+    paddw           m1,            [pd_2]
> >+    movd            r4d,           m1             ; r4d = DC * 2 + 2
> MOVD fix previous issue
>
> >+    paddw           m1,            m0             ; m1 = DC * 3 + 2
> >+    pshuflw         m1,            m1, 0
> >+    pshufd          m1,            m1, 0          ; m1 = pixDCx3
> >+
> >+    ; filter top
> >+    movu            m0,            [r2]
> >+    paddw           m0,            m1
> >+    psraw           m0,            2
> >+    movu            [r0],          m0
> >+
> >+    ; filter top-left
> >+    movzx           r3d, word      [r2 + 32]
> >+    add             r4d,           r3d
> >+    movzx           r3d, word      [r2]
> >+    add             r3d,           r4d
> >+    shr             r3d,           2
> >+    mov             [r0],          r3w
> >+
> >+    ; filter left
> >+    movu            m0,            [r2 + 34]
> >+    paddw           m0,            m1
> >+    psraw           m0,            2
> >+    movh            r3,            m0
> >+    mov             [r0 + r1],     r3w
> >+    shr             r3,            16
> >+    mov             [r0 + r1 * 2], r3w
> >+    shr             r3,            16
> >+    mov             [r0 + r6],     r3w
> >+    shr             r3,            16
> >+    mov             [r0 + r1 * 4], r3w
> >+    pshufd          m0,            m0, 0x6E
> >+    movh            r3,            m0
> >+    mov             [r0 + r5],     r3w
> >+    shr             r3,            16
> >+    mov             [r0 + r6 * 2], r3w
> >+    shr             r3,            16
> >+    mov             [r0 + r7],     r3w
> >+.end:
> >+    RET
> >+
> >+;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >+; void intra_pred_dc(pixel* dst, intptr_t dstStride, pixel* above, int, int filter)
> >+;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > INIT_XMM sse4
> > cglobal intra_pred_dc4, 5,6,2
> >     lea         r3,             [r2 + 18]
> >_______________________________________________
> >x265-devel mailing list
> >x265-devel at videolan.org
> >https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> x265-devel mailing list
> x265-devel at videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/attachments/20150226/1a529413/attachment.html>


More information about the x265-devel mailing list