[x265] [PATCH] chroma_hps[8x8] for i420 avx2 asm: 629c->503c

chen chenm003 at 163.com
Mon Mar 9 22:21:38 CET 2015


 

At 2015-03-09 18:39:50,aasaipriya at multicorewareinc.com wrote:
># HG changeset patch
># User Aasaipriya Chandran <aasaipriya at multicorewareinc.com>
># Date 1425897572 -19800
>#      Mon Mar 09 16:09:32 2015 +0530
># Node ID 516877467b23101b718e5f62397f52d3014c81bb
># Parent  06b67c917202b50c2aa7f4f5c4e0cf7f94b56145
>chroma_hps[8x8] for i420 avx2 asm: 629c->503c
>
>diff -r 06b67c917202 -r 516877467b23 source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp
>--- a/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp	Mon Mar 09 16:06:02 2015 +0530
>+++ b/source/common/x86/asm-primitives.cpp	Mon Mar 09 16:09:32 2015 +0530
>@@ -1792,6 +1792,7 @@
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_16x16].filter_hpp = x265_interp_4tap_horiz_pp_16x16_avx2;
> 
>         p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_4x4].filter_hps = x265_interp_4tap_horiz_ps_4x4_avx2;
>+        p.chroma[X265_CSP_I420].pu[CHROMA_420_8x8].filter_hps = x265_interp_4tap_horiz_ps_8x8_avx2;
> 
>         p.pu[LUMA_4x4].luma_vps = x265_interp_8tap_vert_ps_4x4_avx2;
> 
>diff -r 06b67c917202 -r 516877467b23 source/common/x86/ipfilter8.asm
>--- a/source/common/x86/ipfilter8.asm	Mon Mar 09 16:06:02 2015 +0530
>+++ b/source/common/x86/ipfilter8.asm	Mon Mar 09 16:09:32 2015 +0530
>@@ -1803,6 +1803,79 @@
>     movhps            [r2],         xm3
> .end
>    RET
>+
>+INIT_YMM avx2 
>+cglobal interp_4tap_horiz_ps_8x8, 4,7,6
>+    mov             r4d, r4m
>+    mov             r5d, r5m
>+    add             r3d, r3d
>+
>+%ifdef PIC
>+    lea               r6,           [tab_ChromaCoeff]
>+    vpbroadcastd      m0,           [r6 + r4 * 4]
>+%else
>+    vpbroadcastd      m0,           [tab_ChromaCoeff + r4 * 4]
>+%endif
>+
>+    vbroadcasti128     m2,           [pw_1]
>+    vbroadcasti128     m5,           [pw_2000]
>+    mova               m1,           [tab_Tm]
>+
>+    ; register map
>+    ; m0 - interpolate coeff
>+    ; m1 - shuffle order table
>+    ; m2 - constant word 1
>+
>+    mov                r6d,      8
>+    mov                r4d,      0
why not xor?

>+    dec                r0
>+    test                r5d,     r5d
>+    je                 .loop
>+    sub                r0 , r1
>+    add                r6d , 2             ;3-1=2 (1 row separte in last)
>+
>+.loop
>+    add               r4d,          2
>+    ; Row 0
>+    vbroadcasti128    m3,           [r0]
>+    pshufb            m3,           m1
>+    pmaddubsw         m3,           m0
>+    pmaddwd           m3,           m2
>+
>+    ; Row 1
>+    vbroadcasti128    m4,           [r0 + r1]
>+    pshufb            m4,           m1
>+    pmaddubsw         m4,           m0
>+    pmaddwd           m4,           m2
>+
>+    packssdw          m3,           m4
>+    psubw             m3,           m5
>+
>+    vpermq            m3,           m3,          11011000b
>+    vextracti128      xm4,          m3,     1
>+    movu             [r2],         xm3
>+    movu             [r2 + r3],    xm4
>+
>+    lea               r2,           [r2 + r3 * 2]
>+    lea               r0,           [r0 + r1 * 2]
>+    cmp               r4d,          r6d

why not sub on r6 to reduce one control register?
>+    jnz               .loop
>+    test              r5d,         r5d

if you modify logic on r6, you may use je to replace check on r5
>+    jz                .end
>+
>+    ;Row 11
>+    vbroadcasti128    m3,           [r0]
>+    pshufb            m3,           m1
>+    pmaddubsw         m3,           m0
>+    pmaddwd           m3,           m2
>+
>+    packssdw          m3,           m3
>+    psubw             m3,           m5
>+    vpermq            m3,           m3,          11011000b
>+    vextracti128      xm4,          m3,          1
>+    movu             [r2],         xm3
>+.end
>+   RET
> ;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ;void interp_horiz_ps_c(const pixel* src, intptr_t srcStride, int16_t* dst, intptr_t dstStride, int coeffIdx, int isRowExt)
> ;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>x265-devel mailing list
>x265-devel at videolan.org
>https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/attachments/20150310/d869d9e6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the x265-devel mailing list