[x265] [PATCH] scaling: allow refinement of inter/intra frames when scalefactor is zero
Kavitha Sampath
kavitha at multicorewareinc.com
Mon Apr 30 07:09:57 CEST 2018
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Bhavna Hariharan <
bhavna at multicorewareinc.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:41 PM, <kavitha at multicorewareinc.com> wrote:
>
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Kavitha Sampath <kavitha at multicorewareinc.com>
>> # Date 1524568273 -19800
>> # Tue Apr 24 16:41:13 2018 +0530
>> # Node ID 860c3b32f59e1883b77064b9948e8e17decd4641
>> # Parent 07defe235cde1949c55464952ee1dbdc10baf5e4
>> scaling: allow refinement of inter/intra frames when scalefactor is zero
>>
>> Also disable analysis of CU with min-cu size when scale factor is zero
>>
>> diff -r 07defe235cde -r 860c3b32f59e source/encoder/analysis.cpp
>> --- a/source/encoder/analysis.cpp Thu Apr 12 16:57:19 2018 +0530
>> +++ b/source/encoder/analysis.cpp Tue Apr 24 16:41:13 2018 +0530
>> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@
>> int split = 0;
>> if (m_param->intraRefine && m_param->intraRefine != 4)
>> {
>> - split = ((cuGeom.log2CUSize == (uint32_t)(g_log2Size[m_param->minCUSize]
>> + 1)) && bDecidedDepth);
>> + split = m_param->scaleFactor && ((cuGeom.log2CUSize ==
>> (uint32_t)(g_log2Size[m_param->minCUSize] + 1)) && bDecidedDepth);
>> if (cuGeom.log2CUSize == (uint32_t)(g_log2Size[m_param->minCUSize])
>> && !bDecidedDepth)
>> bAlreadyDecided = false;
>> }
>> @@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@
>> m_refineLevel = m_param->interRefine;
>> else
>> m_refineLevel = m_frame->m_classifyFrame ? 1 : 3;
>> - int split = (m_refineLevel && cuGeom.log2CUSize ==
>> (uint32_t)(g_log2Size[m_param->minCUSize] + 1) && bDecidedDepth);
>> + int split = (m_param->scaleFactor && m_refineLevel &&
>> cuGeom.log2CUSize == (uint32_t)(g_log2Size[m_param->minCUSize] + 1) &&
>> bDecidedDepth);
>> td.split = split;
>>
>> if (bDecidedDepth)
>> @@ -2494,7 +2494,7 @@
>> mode.cu.m_mvd[list][pu.puAbsPartIdx] =
>> mode.cu.m_mv[list][pu.puAbsPartIdx] - mode.amvpCand[list][ref][mode.
>> cu.m_mvpIdx[list][pu.puAbsPartIdx]]/*mvp*/;
>> }
>> }
>> - else if(m_param->scaleFactor)
>> + else
>> {
>> MVField candMvField[MRG_MAX_NUM_CANDS][2]; //
>> double length for mv of both lists
>> uint8_t candDir[MRG_MAX_NUM_CANDS];
>> diff -r 07defe235cde -r 860c3b32f59e source/encoder/encoder.cpp
>> --- a/source/encoder/encoder.cpp Thu Apr 12 16:57:19 2018 +0530
>> +++ b/source/encoder/encoder.cpp Tue Apr 24 16:41:13 2018 +0530
>> @@ -2694,7 +2694,7 @@
>>
>> if (p->intraRefine)
>> {
>> - if (!p->analysisLoad || p->analysisReuseLevel < 10 ||
>> !p->scaleFactor)
>> + if (!p->analysisLoad || p->analysisReuseLevel < 10)
>> {
>> x265_log(p, X265_LOG_WARNING, "Intra refinement requires
>> analysis load, analysis-reuse-level 10, scale factor. Disabling intra
>> refine.\n");
>>
>
> All the warning messages still say that scale factor is required to enable
> refinement methods, we can remove that.
>
> I see that you've enabled inter-refine, intra-refine and refine-mv without
> scale-factor, is there any reason for not enabling dynamic refinement
> without scale factor?
>
Dynamic refinemement + scalefactor 0 requires some more testing. I thought
of sending that as a separate patch.
>
>
>
>> p->intraRefine = 0;
>> @@ -2703,7 +2703,7 @@
>>
>> if (p->interRefine)
>> {
>> - if (!p->analysisLoad || p->analysisReuseLevel < 10 ||
>> !p->scaleFactor)
>> + if (!p->analysisLoad || p->analysisReuseLevel < 10)
>> {
>> x265_log(p, X265_LOG_WARNING, "Inter refinement requires
>> analysis load, analysis-reuse-level 10, scale factor. Disabling inter
>> refine.\n");
>> p->interRefine = 0;
>> @@ -2737,7 +2737,7 @@
>>
>> if (p->mvRefine)
>> {
>> - if (!p->analysisLoad || p->analysisReuseLevel < 10 ||
>> !p->scaleFactor)
>> + if (!p->analysisLoad || p->analysisReuseLevel < 10)
>> {
>> x265_log(p, X265_LOG_WARNING, "MV refinement requires
>> analysis load, analysis-reuse-level 10, scale factor. Disabling MV
>> refine.\n");
>> p->mvRefine = 0;
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> x265-devel mailing list
>> x265-devel at videolan.org
>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Kavitha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.videolan.org/pipermail/x265-devel/attachments/20180430/fa811f05/attachment.html>
More information about the x265-devel
mailing list