[vlc-devel] [TROLL] LGPL vs GPL
jpsaman at videolan.org
Thu Nov 21 09:45:49 CET 2013
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <jb at videolan.org>wrote:
> I hope I had you with the subject, but please read :)
> So, most of the work on relicensing playback and streaming to LGPLv2.1+
> is now done.
Great, well done.
> Yet, some part remains, and are listed under it.
> If I mark with a "??" this means I need your input.
> dts.c, because jlj
> t140, ??
Codecs should be LGPL (if possible).
> x264, x265, because Loren refused
> DBus, gestures, hotkeys, globalhotkeys, motion, netsync, oldrc,
> I think some should be moved to LGPL, like motion, because of rotate
> filter depends on it. Opinons??
If rotate depends on motion, then it should move to LGPL.
> ?? What should we do?
IMHO lua should be LGPL
> audioscrobbler, logger, stats: what should we do about those??
> Playlist export and misc/rtsp could be considered as sout, but are
> Not really useful. Other opionions??
> We never discussed about that, but I think LGPL for sap and upnp and
> podcast would be nice. Opinions??
Service discovery should be LGPL'ed
> Duplicate is missing because of a single commit that was rewritten by
> Rémi afterwards. I don't know yet what I can legally do.
> RTP is missing because of important code,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the vlc-devel