[vlc] Re: Why not OS 9?
rick
mibz at optushome.com.au
Sat Nov 23 03:15:59 CET 2002
i dont belive thats true, the is no dos version or riscos version there are
alot of operating systems they havnt produced it for, just becouse oneperson
gets something doesnt mean everyone else should, if its in there aggenda
they shall do it, you dont see all the windows people making a fuss about
the lack of dvd support do you? *sigh*
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Hogg" <hogster_bogster at hotmail.com>
To: <vlc at videolan.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: [vlc] Why not OS 9?
> Why aren't you making a version of VLC for OS 9? Couldn't you at least
make
> it carbonised (ie. for both 9 and OSX)? I mean come on - you've made
version
> of vlc for practically every other operating system on this planet, except
> OS 9 - which itself is the most widely used operating system on the mac.
>
> Please could you consider this!
>
>
> David Hogg
> www.david-hogg.co.uk
> hogster_bogster at hotmail.com
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
> --
> This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
> To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
> If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
>
--
This is the vlc mailing-list, see http://www.videolan.org/vlc/
To unsubscribe, please read http://www.videolan.org/lists.html
If you are in trouble, please contact <postmaster at videolan.org>
More information about the vlc
mailing list