[x264-devel] Re: X264 Decoder
Hilton Garcia Fernandes
hgfernan at lsi.usp.br
Thu Nov 10 15:13:53 CET 2005
Sorry if that's been already discussed, but i'd like to ask why to
replicate the decoder effort of the libavcodec team ?
Is it because libavcodec is too generic ?
Thanks,
Hilton
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005, Stephen Henry <Stephen.Henry at elixent.com> said:
> I had a look at the decoder a while back, for the same reasons as
> Dimosthenis suggested, but I quickly found that the shared code between
> the encoder and decoder and since diverged quite significantly. It
> actually took quite a lot of effort just to get the decoder to compile.
> Many of the problems I was having wasn't the fact that the decoder code
> was incomplete, in actually the majority of it had already been written,
> it was the fact that because the "common" structures and functions to
> the encoder and decoder appeared to change since the decoder was last
> run. This meant that subtle bugs would creap into the decoder and would
> be quite difficult and lengthy to track down where it had gone wrong.
>
> To be honest, you might have better luck if you simply delete the
> majority of the decoder code and simply build it up from stratch. It
> would probably take you less time overall...
>
> Stephen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: x264-devel-bounce at videolan.org
> [mailto:x264-devel-bounce at videolan.org] On Behalf Of Dimosthenis
> STAMATIOU
> Sent: 09 November 2005 15:16
> To: x264-devel at videolan.org
> Subject: [x264-devel] Re: X264 Decoder
>
> Heejune AHN wrote:
>> Thanks, Guillaume.
>>
>> So, you don't have any plan for decoder release anyway.
>>
>> Thanks for reminding me of ffmpeg. I forgot it. I rechecked it today.
> but it sill has many "FIXME" and "incompleted functions" in my view. In
> fact I searched archive for 5 months before November. I could't find the
> same topics, just questions on how to build decoder t in Windows.
>>
>> Anyway, I should review ffmpeg h264.c and update x264 anyway for my
> internal use.
>>
>> Thanks again!
>> Heejune
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11/8/05, Heejune AHN <heejune at snut.ac.kr> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I am Heejune, quite new to this project, but I have experience
>>> with MPEG-2, MPEG-4 codecs.
>>> After I found X264 is one of fast h264 codec in public domain, I am
>>> doing hard to catch up the progress.
>>> Several question on the Decoder here.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You should have dig the archives, all if not most of your questions
>> have been answered before.
>>
>>
>>
>>> - How is going with the decoder part? why Encoder first ?
>>> Any due date for decoder part? We need decoder before the end
>>> of this year.
>>>
>>
>> FFmpeg features a state-of-the-art decoder already. There's no plan
>> that I know of to improve x264 decoder.
>>
>> Guillaume
>> --
>> Reading doesn't hurt, really!
>> -- Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>>
>>
> Hi.
>
> The fact that there's no plan of improving the internal x264 decoder
> doesn't mean you're prohibited from doing such a thing, it's just that
> the effort is mainly driven on improving the encoder first. Also, making
> the internal decoder work would mean no longer having to download the
> whole ffmpeg library just to decode x264(at least on Windows, that is).
>
> Dimosthenis
>
> --
> This is the x264-devel mailing-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
>
>
>
> --
> This is the x264-devel mailing-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
>
>
--
Hilton Garcia Fernandes
Nucleo de Tecnologias sem Fio (NTSF) -- Wireless Technologies Team
Lab de Sistemas Integraveis Tecnologico (LSI) -- Integrable Systems Lab
Escola Politecnica (Poli) -- Engineering School
Univ S Paulo (USP)
Tel: (5511)3091-5676 (work)
(5511)8131-5213 (mobile)
Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto,158 trav.3 CEP 05508-900
S. Paulo -- SP -- Brazil
Pagina inicial: http://www.lsi.usp.br/~hgfernan
--
This is the x264-devel mailing-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://developers.videolan.org/lists.html
More information about the x264-devel
mailing list